Learning in Teams
This thesis is the product of a final project
of a Master of Arts degree produced in the year 1999/2000 and is
integrating the subjects Communication and Adult Education at Roskilde
University.
The title of the thesis ‘Learning in Teams’
applies to the learning that goes on within the community of instructors
working together on a specific course. The thesis evolves around
the problem formulation: initiated by a specific example of team
teaching it is analysed which factors that improve and restrict
the instructors’ learning in teams.
Taking this outset, I observe, describe and analyse
a specific team of instructors at a specific course, inspired by
the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. This is done by focusing
on the participation of the team in the field, including the relations
of which the team and the course are a part. The analysis draws
an image of the instructors’ actions in the educational room
and gives an indication of which factors can improve and restrict
the instructors’ learning in teams. Apart from Bourdieu, Etienne
Wenger’s theory on communities of practice and Henriette Christrup’s
view of power relations are included.
The analysis is the result of participation in
the specific course including observation of and questioning about
the praxis of the team. Further, my own reflections play an active
part with respect to the description of the empirical data. The
dialogues with the team have been recorded on video in order to
allow subsequent analysis of the body language. The subject of the
course is negotiation and the learners are representatives from
a trade union within the health and social sector. The managers
and instructors of the course are the instructors Lene and Jette.
It is concluded that both the subject matter of
the course, the personal relations within the team and the instructors’
positions within the overall power field of the organisation has
an impact on the team learning. The subject matter of the course
is influenced by the focus of the team on the weaker learners, which
is seen through the parallel existence of a culture of care and
a culture of struggle. The learning depends on the team’s
ability to reflect and talk about this in order to learn to deal
with and make use of this complexity. The subject matter is also
influenced by the team’s effort to create a link between the
course and the everyday work situation of the learners through specific
exercises of negotiation and through the participant’s influence
on the course. The learning depends on the team’s ability
to give room for the participant’s personal involvement, development
and influence within the course.
The personal relation within the team and the
instructors’ positions within the overall power field of the
organisation is affected by power relations. The power relations
are seen when each of the instructors is struggling to define the
reality within the team in order to gain a superior position within
the field. This power relation is conflict filled which makes knowledge
sharing and learning quite difficult. The learning depends on the
instructors’ ability to cope with conflicts and share their
knowledge with the rest of the agents in the field.
In the perspective part, a proposal as to how
to create development as a consultant is brought forth. It is pointed
out that as a consultant it is important to have access to the complex
affairs which are part of the life of the instructor and that the
consultant must acquire competence to act on this. The last part
of the thesis is a review of the used method.
Copenhagen,
July 2000
Torben Heikel Vinther
Toppen af siden
|